The Judge pulled the lawyers for the three cases into chambers before it all began and advised them that he would be issuing a default judgment in our favor, since the Defense council failed to show, and wanted to end it there. We argued that all the evidence needed to be entered in to record so the Judge allowed for a speedy hearing where all evidence was entered into the court record. What that means is this… Any appeal, if one is even possible, would be based on the evidence provided by the lawyers in each case.
http://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2012/01/26/obama-challenge-hearing-gavel-to-gavel-live-video-stream-coverage-from-atlanta-ga/
http://www.cbsatlanta.com/story/16607410/judge-considers-whether-to-keep-obama-on-ballot
http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2012/01/26/georgia-eligibility-judge-will-rule-against-obama/
http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2012/01/georgia-ballot-hearing-judge-wanted-to.html
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com
Here's the legal documents that kicked Hussein Soetoro's gay crack ass in court today:
http://libertylegalfoundation.org/certification-class-action/georgia-ballot-challenge/
After two hours of hearing from plaintiffs challenging Barack Obama’s eligibility to run for the office of President in 2012, Judge Michael Malihi for the Office of State Administrative Hearings for the State of Georgia asked them to file briefs with him on their positions no later than Sunday, February 5.
The complaints originated on October 25 of last year with a lawsuit filed by the Liberty Legal Foundation (LLF) requesting an injunction against the Democratic Party that would prohibit the party from certifying that Obama is constitutionally qualified to run for office in 2012. Without that certification, says the foundation, Obama’s name would not appear on any ballot in the general election.
The case has nothing to do with Obama’s birth certificate or his place of birth or how many Social Security numbers he may have. As noted by LLF,
These issues are completely irrelevant to our argument. [Our] lawsuit simply points out that the Supreme Court has defined “natural-born citizen” as a person born to two parents who were both U.S. citizens at the time of the natural-born citizen’s birth. Obama’s father was never a U.S. citizen. Therefore, Obama can never be a natural-born citizen. His place of birth is irrelevant.
Article II, Section 1, of the U.S. Constitution reads, in part: “No person except a natural born citizen ... shall be eligible to the office of President.” Since the only entity responsible for vetting a candidate’s qualifications to hold office is the political party that nominates the candidate, LLF chose to sue the Democratic Party and thus “we ... avoid taking on any state or federal government.” And Georgia has a state law that requires that “every candidate for federal office shall meet the constitutional and statutory qualifications for holding the office being sought.”
The Supreme Court’s 1875 Minor v. Happersett ruling stated:
The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.
A motion to quash a subpoena issued to Obama to attend the hearing was rejected by the judge, who did not find merit in arguments that the subpoena would require the President "to interrupt duties as President of the United States” and that the subpoena is, “on its face, unreasonable.” Specifically, Judge Malihi wrote: “Defendant fails to provide any legal authority to support his motion to quash the subpoena to attend [and] has failed to enlighten the Court with any legal authority evidencing why his attendance is ‘unreasonable or oppressive, or that [his] testimony ... [is] irrelevant, immaterial, or cumulative and unnecessary.’... Thus, the argument regarding service is without merit. Accordingly, Defendant’s motion to quash is denied.”
The hearing was held anyway with lawyers presenting their cases against Obama, the Defendant. American Thinker writers Cindy Simpson and Alan Halbert noted:
Under Georgia law, the Secretary of State had properly deferred the ballot challenges to the OSAH [Office of State Administrative Hearings] for the court's opinion, and the determination of whether or not Obama's name will appear on the Georgia ballot ultimately rests with the Secretary.
The judge could end the matter with a ruling of a default judgment against the President. Or he could direct the Secretary to declare the President ineligible to run as a candidate for the presidency. Whatever the outcome, the American Thinker writers claim that by his ignoring the subpoena, “Obama has openly shown his disregard for the laws of that state.” This opinion was shared by Van Irion, the LLF attorney bringing the case against the president:
[He has] decided that he is above the Courts, the law, and the Constitution. He has just indicated ... that he is not subject to their authority. This is the true story from today.
http://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/constitution/10689-obama-ignores-challenge-to-his-presidential-eligibility-in-georgia
A hearing to determine whether President Barack Obama is eligible to be on the primary ballot in Georgia took place on Thursday, with the defendants, Obama and his legal team, notably absent.
Georgia Deputy Chief Judge Michael Malihi subpoenaed the president last week after refusing to hear his legal team's challenge to the case, but neither Obama nor his lawyers ever planned on showing up.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/27/georgia-birther-hearing-obama_n_1236719.html
In his high school yearbook Hussein Obama Soetoro was listed in the official Pot Smokers Club
http://www.wctv.tv/news/headlines/President_Obamas_Georgia_Ballot_Hearing_138108643.html
First the good news. Yesterday–26 January–I watched live feed of an extraordinary event. The setting was a courtroom in Georgia and the presiding jurist was Deputy Chief Judge Michael Malihi. The case centered around and on Barack Hussein Obama’s eligibility to be placed on the Georgia ballot in the upcoming 2012 General Election(s). During the hearing, 3 attorneys–Orly Taitz, Van Irion and J. Mark Hatfield–presented their witnesses and individual ineligibility cases brought against Mr. Obama. Neither Obama nor his attorney Michael Jablonski were in attendance–both having opted to avoid and skip the proceedings altogether–and none of the court’s required production of Obama’s eligibility was provided.
Note: Jablonski seems to be perpetuating the long-standing myth that his client is above the law and now–by association–he appears to be operating under the delusion that he is, also. This brings up the interesting possibility of Atty. Jablonski–having provided no apparent legal reason for his non-attendance–being subject to revocation of his license to practice law in the State of Georgia. But, that’s a discussion for another time.
The evidence presented was strong and there appears to be, at least, a 50-50 chance of Judge Malihi and the State of Georgia ruling in plaintiffs’ favor. Judge Malihi will file a report, including his recommendations, with the Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp. When a decision is given by Judge Malihi, this will be the first time that any ruling on the merits of Obama’s eligibility will have been rendered. Note: After yesterday’s hearing there was some indication that Judge Malihi was planning to rule for the plaintiffs. But, I have been unable to confirm the report.
Now the extremely bad news for US citizens. First, on 19 January 2012, multiple videos were made of a shipment–via rail–of hundreds of Bradley tanks and related equipment moving from Northern California Southward. Then, a few days later, the US military, DHS and local LAPD leaders advised of military drills on the streets of Los Angeles. Note: Said streets, we are advised, will remain secret and no one will be allowed in or out while the ’drills’ are going on. If that’s true and civilians are cordoned off and allowed nether entry nor exit, Martial Law will already be in place.
The US military, Department of Homeland Security and LOCAL Police are conducting “urban warfare exercises” in recent and unprecedented “showings of force” under the now undeniable (by any intelligent beings) Dictator-in-Chief Barack Hussein Obama. These military forces are inhabiting the streets and air of and over Los Angeles, Boston, Little Rock, Miami and Colorado amongst others. At a joint meeting between DHS, US Army Garrison-Fort Carson and IMCOM (Installation Management Command) in June 2011, the reason for the seminar was given as: “The focus of the two-day seminar was to evaluate installation performance and develop corrective action plans to improve and maintain emergency preparedness, prevent hostile acts, protect Soldiers, Family members and civilians, and improve response and recovery capabilities.” Hostile acts? If this true “emergency preparedness” to what hostile acts might they be referring? And what would cause these hostile acts? Certainly not the supposed ‘weather emergencies’ they are trying to push onto the American people. When did a tornado cause hostile acts from the American public?
Copkilling Communist Weatherman Underground terrorist bomber in CIA's Operation Northwoods Bill Ayres ghostwrote Obama's "autobiography" Dreams From My Father
Black Hawk helicopters were filmed flying around and over bank buildings in both Los Angeles and Miami. Military personnel are seen flying in position-ready mode to shoot at targets (that’s people) on the ground. Yet, these exercises are billed as ‘for some future foreign adventure’. Really? We are going to fly our Black Hawks over the banks of foreign countries, in order to protect them while, in actuality, hundreds of tanks (at least a Brigade) are being sent to our own cities? No. As Judge Judith Sheindlin (aka Judge Judy) often says: “If it doesn’t make sense, it isn’t true.”
Is Obama’s violent Martial Law almost upon us? It sure looks as if the positioning under the guise of “exercises” is underway and being implemented. And…what about those tanks that appear to have been sent to Los Angeles? Wonder where they’re being stored? So do I.
One thing is now very clear. Obama, his DHS, the US Military and local law enforcement (who by the way would not be deployed to foreign soil) appear to be working to take down US citizens in fairly short order. Soon they will come for any and all of our weapons. Hitler did it in Germany under the pretense of “It will help us protect you” in the 1930s. After that came the (at least) six-million Jews’ Holocaust. Although I have heard many times that US citizens won’t allow it, I have strong doubts. US citizens are already allowing their small children and the elderly to be sexually groped and prodded by perverse TSA employees–their own children, folks!
Will you be courageous enough to fight against the tyranny that has, already, almost totally encompassed us? Or, will you submit to the imposition of your complete slavery? The decision shortly will be forced upon us all.
“Above all, we must realize that no arsenal, or no weapon in the arsenals of the world, is so formidable as the will and moral courage of free men and women. It is a weapon our adversaries in today’s world do not have.”–President Ronald Reagan
VIDEO: Military Helicopters Conduct Covert Exercises Over U.S. Bank Building:
at infowars.com
Military Exercises in Downtown LA:
at cfns.org
Joint military exercises in Boston, LA, Little Rock in past six months:
at deathby1000papercuts.com
HOMELAND SECURITY REAL EXERCISES IN MIAMI:
at youtube.com
Exercise tests homeland security in Colorado:
at csmng.com
BREAKING! MILITARY EQUIPMENT Filmed 1\19\12 near Santa Cruz, Southbound:
at youtube.com
Brigade: “A brigade is a major tactical military formation that is typically composed of four to five battalions, plus supporting elements depending on the era and nationality of a given army and could be perceived as an enlarged/reinforced regiment. Usually, a brigade is a sub-component of a division, a larger unit consisting of two or more brigades.”
at en.wikipedia.org
http://gulagbound.com/25516/obama-and-his-syndicate-some-good-obama-eligibility-hearing-and-some-chillingly-bad-news/comment-page-1/
http://fireflyfans.net/mthread.asp?b=18&t=50877&m=879474#879474
Posts
